Sea levels are rising and as a consequence so are the number of sea walls. However, until now the environmental impacts of sea walls and other engineering “armoring” have been inadequately studied. A team of scientists from UC Santa Barbara and the National Science Foundation's Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) network recently collaborated to publish a study in the journal Estuaries and Coasts that analyzes a broad range of environmental effects from shoreline armoring in soft marine sediments, shedding light how such infrastructure is changing more than just landscapes.
"This is one of the first attempts to assess how engineering structures on beaches and other sedimentary environments affect the biota that inhabits these locations," said David Garrison, an LTER program director at the National Science Foundation. "What was novel about this cross-site collaboration was putting these site-specific studies into perspective by making comparisons across a broad range of habitats," said co-author Merryl Alber.
The study looked at results from 88 previous studies that analyzed different types of armoring in diverse soft sediment ecosystems in order to develop a unique conceptual model. "Our model uses two simple axes: the environmental setting of the armoring structure in terms of hydrodynamic energy, like wave and tide regimes, and the degree to which a structure was built to slow water movement or actually stop it from getting through," lead author Jenny Dugan said.
Most of the cases from the existing literature had been in low-energy environments such as salt marshes, tidal creeks, and mangroves. About one-quarter of the cases were from medium-energy systems like harbors, river mouths, and estuaries; only 15% were from high-energy environments such as open coast sandy beaches. Dugan points out that sea level rise means that shoreline armoring structures will experience greater hydrodynamic energy, regardless the type of setting the structure is in.
While past studies had focused on examining how sea walls and armoring affect changes in habitat and species distribution, this model also takes into account nutrient cycling, connectivity, productivity and trophic structure. The team found that shoreline armoring negatively effects every single one of these categories.
The study explains more in depth, writing that they found “a higher frequency of negative responses for structures designed to stop water flow within a given hydrodynamic energy level. Comparisons across the hydrodynamic energy axis were less clear-cut, but negative responses prevailed (>78%) in high-energy environments. Across the 207 armoring effects studied, 71% were significantly negative, 22% were significantly positive, and 7% reported no significant difference.”
From this study stems the hope that the team’s results will advise engineers how to better take the environment into consideration when constructing soft-sediment shoreline armoring. Dugan says that their results aim to encourage developers to incorporate the ecological costs into the monetary value of projects based on differences in environmental settings and hydrodynamic energy. To see a video of one example of how to build a sea wall, watch the footage below.
Sources: Estuaries and Coasts, Science Daily
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Title: More than a Seawall: Building Resilience through Community-Driven Development in the Philippines
Description: In the village of Mangoroco in Iloilo Province, Philippines, a community-driven development approach has had wider benefits beyond the infrastructure produced: working together fostered a resilience that saved local people from the wrath of Typhoon Haiyan.
VO: The sea is a source of life for the community. People earn from it. Children enjoy bathing in it. But it can also be a source of danger for them. In the province of Iloilo in the Philippines lies a quiet fishing village, Mangoroco.
Mangoroco experience constant flooding. KALAHI-CIDSS is a program that seeks to alleviate poverty through a community-driven development. The residents conduct social investigation of their community so they can develop and prioritize solutions to their communities concerns, which they will present to other villagers in a municipal forum to seek funding, upon prioritization community residents implement their projects.
They all agreed that a seawall is necessary to save Mangoroco. The community presented their proposal to the municipal forum. The residents of Mangoroco together with KALAHI-CIDSS began the construction of the seawall. The stone seawall was completed in 2007, by 2009 the stones had stabilized. So, it’s time to apply cement plaster to avoid erosion of the seawall. In 2010, the community completed the seawall upgrade with the support of KALAHI-CIDSS. On November 8, 2013 Typhoon Haiyan smashed and destroyed much of central Philippines.
SOT: Diana Estocado
Resident of Mangoroco
The wind was strong and the waves were big. We rushed to the school for shelter, using the seawall as our pathway.
VO: Mangoroco endured Haiyan’s overwhelming force because of the seawall.
SOT: Sinon Jagorin Sr.
Monitoring and Inspection Team Member
KALAHI-CIDSS volunteer, Brgy. Mangoroco
When Haiyan came, if not for the seawall there would have been a lot of death and damage to properties.
VO: Typhoon Haiyan left a crack in the seawall, however, with the communities own initiative, the damage was repaired. Ten years after the seawall remains rock solid. Beyond the infrastructure, the community learned something more from KALAHI-CIDSS – empowerment and community participation.
SOT: Resident of Mangoroco
The seawall is important but the greater gift is community involvement.